SKIP TO CONTENT
yield aggregatorUpdated Feb 15, 2024

Yearn vs Convex

Comparing yield aggregators with different approaches to DeFi optimization.

Feature Comparison

FeatureYearnConvex
Focus
Broad
Curve-SpecificTie
TVL
$500M+
$2B+Winner
Assets Supported
ManyWinner
Curve LPs
Complexity
Higher
LowerWinner

Overview

Yearn Finance and Convex Finance both optimize DeFi yields, but with fundamentally different approaches. Yearn runs diverse automated strategies across many protocols, while Convex focuses specifically on maximizing Curve Finance yields through veCRV aggregation.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Strategy Focus

Yearn: Broad yield optimization across lending, LP, and complex strategies for many assets. Convex: Laser-focused on Curve ecosystem. Boosting Curve yields through aggregated veCRV power.

TVL and Market Position

  • Yearn: $500M+ TVL across 100+ vaults
  • Convex: $2B+ TVL, controls ~50% of veCRV

Fee Structure

  • Yearn: 2% management + 20% performance
  • Convex: 16% of CRV rewards (split with LPs)

When to Choose Each

Yearn: Want automated yield across many assets and protocols Convex: Want maximized Curve LP yields or CRV staking

Risk Analysis

Both are heavily audited. Yearn's risk is strategy-specific; Convex's risk is concentrated in Curve dependency.

Track yields with Fensory.

Risk Analysis

Yearn has diverse strategy risks; Convex concentrates risk in Curve ecosystem. Both are well-audited.

Verdict

Use Yearn for broad yield optimization; Convex for maximizing Curve returns specifically.

Find the best opportunities on Yearn and Convex.

Track live yields, compare protocols, and build your DeFi portfolio with Fensory.

GET EARLY ACCESSArrow right