SKIP TO CONTENT
derivativesUpdated Feb 15, 2024

dYdX vs GMX

Comparing leading decentralized perpetual futures exchanges.

View dYdX →View GMX →

Feature Comparison

FeaturedYdXGMX
Model
Order Book
Pool-BasedTie
Chain
Cosmos
Arbitrum/AvalancheTie
LP Opportunity
Limited
StrongWinner
Trading Speed
Fast
FastTie

Overview

dYdX and GMX are the two largest decentralized perpetual futures exchanges, taking fundamentally different approaches to on-chain derivatives trading.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Architecture

dYdX V4: Order book on dedicated Cosmos chain. CEX-like experience with self-custody. GMX: Pool-based model where LPs are counterparty. Available on Arbitrum and Avalanche.

Trading Experience

  • dYdX: Order book with maker/taker fees, familiar to CEX traders
  • GMX: Zero price impact but relies on oracle prices

Yield Opportunities

  • dYdX: Stake DYDX for fee share (10-20% APY)
  • GMX: GLP/GM pools earn trading fees (15-40% APY)

When to Choose Each

dYdX: Prefer order book trading, want Cosmos ecosystem exposure GMX: Want to earn yield as LP, prefer EVM chains

Compare perp yields with Fensory.

Risk Analysis

Both carry derivatives trading risks. DYdX uses Cosmos security; GMX relies on EVM and oracle accuracy.

Verdict

dYdX for order book trading; GMX for LP-based yield from perpetual volume.

See current APY across both protocols side by side.

Track live yields, compare protocols, and build your DeFi portfolio with Fensory.

GET EARLY ACCESSArrow right
← BACK TO COMPARISONS