Compare Fireblocks and BitGo for institutional digital asset custody. Security, features, chains, and enterprise capabilities analysis.
Quick Verdict
Choose Fireblocks for MPC and chain breadth; Choose BitGo for Qualified Custodian status
| Feature | Fireblocks | BitGo |
|---|---|---|
| Security Model | MPC | Multi-sig |
| Chain Support | 40+ chains | 600+ assets |
| Qualified Custodian | No | Yes✓ |
| Developer Experience | Modern✓ | Comprehensive |
| Insurance | Available | $150M+✓ |
Multi-chain support
Fireblocks
Broader blockchain coverage
Regulatory compliance
BitGo
Qualified Custodian status
Trading infrastructure
Fireblocks
Modern API design
## Quick Verdict
Both Fireblocks and BitGo are leaders in institutional digital asset custody, each with distinct approaches.
Modern infrastructure platform using MPC technology, known for extensive chain support and developer-friendly APIs.
Pioneer in institutional custody, known for multi-sig security and qualified custodian status through trust company.
**Fireblocks**: MPC (Multi-Party Computation)
**BitGo**: Multi-signature
**Fireblocks**: 40+ blockchains
**BitGo**: 600+ assets (fewer chains, more tokens)
**Fireblocks**: SOC 2, ISO 27001
**BitGo**: Qualified Custodian (SD Trust)
**Fireblocks**: Highly rated, modern APIs
**BitGo**: Comprehensive, longer history
Integrate with both custody providers through Fensory Connect's infrastructure layer.
Fensory Connect provides unified API access to both Fireblocks and BitGo, plus 50+ other issuers.
SCHEDULE A CALL